This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TO0495(01)
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Gratis iҫ ve Dis Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Gratis iҫ ve Dis Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 –
Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret v EUIPO (gratis)
(Joined Cases T‑495/17 and T‑496/17)
(EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
1. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Assessment of distinctive character — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 15, 16) |
|
2. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Marks constituted of advertising slogans — Flattering promotional formula (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see para. 17) |
|
3. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Assessment of distinctive character — Criteria — Perception of the trade mark by the relevant public — Attention level of the public (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see para. 21) |
|
4. |
EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks devoid of any distinctive character — Figurative marks gratis (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 27-30, 38) |
|
5. |
EU trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Legality — Examination by the EU judicature — Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see para. 34) |
|
6. |
EU trade mark — Decisions of the Office — Principle of equal treatment — Principle of sound administration — EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice — Principle of legality — Need for a strict and complete examination in each particular case (Council Regulation No 207/2009) (see paras 35-37) |
Re:
Actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2017 (Cases R 506/2017-2 and R 507/2017-2) concerning the applications for registration of the figurative signs gratis as EU trade marks.
Operative part
|
1. |
The actions are dismissed. |
|
2. |
Gratis iç ve Dis Ticaret AŞ shall pay the costs. |