Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TO0207(01)

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 September 2017.
Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v European Commission.
Action for annulment — Measures never having been adopted — Request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate — Request that the application be interpreted as referring to a measure other than the contested measures — Dismissal — Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-207/16.

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 September 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Commission

(Case T‑207/16)

(Action for annulment — Measures never having been adopted — Request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate — Request that the application be interpreted as referring to a measure other than the contested measures — Dismissal — Manifest inadmissibility)

Actions for annulment—Actionable measures—Concept—Measures never adopted—Not included / precluded—Request that the application be interpreted as seeking annulment of a measure other than those challenged—Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 263 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.)

(see paras 34, 35, 37, 38)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of an alleged exclusion decision taken against the applicant and of an alleged decision to register the applicant and to activate the exclusion warning against the applicant in the Early Warning System (EWS) or in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES).

Operative part

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.

The Commission is ordered to bear its own costs in the main proceedings and in the application for interim measures, and to pay two thirds of the costs of Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis in those proceedings.

3.

Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis is ordered to bear one third of its own costs in those proceedings.
Top