EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007CA0404

Case C-404/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság, Republic of Hungary) — Criminal proceedings brought by Győrgy Katz against István Roland Sós (Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA — Standing of victims in criminal proceedings — Private prosecutor in substitution for the public prosecutor — Testimony of the victim as a witness)

OJ C 301, 22.11.2008, p. 11–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.11.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/11


Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság, Republic of Hungary) — Criminal proceedings brought by Győrgy Katz against István Roland Sós

(Case C-404/07) (1)

(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA - Standing of victims in criminal proceedings - Private prosecutor in substitution for the public prosecutor - Testimony of the victim as a witness)

(2008/C 301/20)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties in the criminal proceedings

Győrgy Katz against István Roland Sós

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíróság — Interpretation of Articles 2 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 1) — National legislation precluding the possibility of the victim giving evidence in criminal proceedings instituted by the victim as a substitute private prosecutor

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings are to be interpreted as not obliging a national court to permit the victim to be heard as a witness in criminal proceedings instituted by a substitute private prosecution such as that in issue in the main proceedings. However, in the absence of such a possibility, it must be possible for the victim to be permitted to give testimony which can be taken into account as evidence.


(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.


Top