EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/168/15

Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ — Thematic priority area ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’ — Call identifiers: FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-6, FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-7

OJ C 168, 8.7.2005, p. 54–63 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.7.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/54


Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

Thematic priority area ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’

Call identifiers: FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-6, FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-7

(2005/C 168/15)

1.

In accordance with Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 27 June 2002, concerning the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) (1), the Council adopted on 30 September 2002 the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002-2006) (2) (referred to as ‘the specific programme’).

In accordance with Article 5(1) of the specific programme, the Commission of the European Communities (referred to as ‘the Commission’) has adopted on 9 December 2002 a work programme (3) (referred to as ‘the work programme’) setting out in greater detail the objectives and scientific and technological priorities of the specific programme, and the timetable for implementation.

In accordance with Article 9(1) of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 16 December 2002, concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community Sixth Framework Programme (2002 to 2006) (4) (referred to as ‘the rules for participation’), proposals for indirect RTD actions should be submitted under the terms of calls for proposals.

2.

The present calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions (referred to as ‘the calls’) comprises the present general part and the specific conditions that are described in the annexes. The annexes indicate in particular, the dates of closure for the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions, an indicative date for the completion of the evaluations, the indicative budget, the instruments and the areas concerned, the evaluation criteria for the evaluation of proposals for indirect RTD actions, the minimum number of participants, and any applicable restrictions.

3.

Natural or legal persons fulfilling the conditions stated in the rules for participation and that do not fall under any of the exclusion cases in the rules for participation or in Article 114(2) of the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5) (referred to as ‘the proposers’) are invited to submit to the Commission proposals for indirect RTD actions subject to the conditions in the rules for participation and in the call concerned being fulfilled.

The conditions of participation of the proposers will be verified within the framework of the negotiation of the indirect RTD action. Before that however, proposers will have signed a declaration stating that they do not fall under any of the cases given by Article 93(1) of the Financial Regulation. They will also have given the Commission the information listed in Article 173(2) of the Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, of 23 December 2002, laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6).

The European Community has adopted an equal opportunities policy and, on this basis, women are particularly encouraged to either submit proposals for indirect RTD actions or participate in the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions.

4.

The Commission makes available to proposers guides for proposers relating to the calls which contain information on the preparation and the submission of a proposal for an indirect RTD action. The Commission also makes available Guidelines on Proposal Evaluation and Selection Procedures (7). These guides and guidelines, as well as the work programme and other information relating to the calls, can be obtained from the Commission via the following addresses:

European Commission

The FP6 Information Desk

Directorate General RTD

B-1049 Brussels

Internet address: http://fp6.cordis.lu/lifescihealth/calls.cfm

5.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions are invited to be submitted only as an electronic proposal via the web-based Electronic Proposal Submission System (EPSS (8)). In exceptional cases, however, a co-ordinator may request permission from the Commission to submit on paper in advance of a call deadline. This should be done by writing to one of the following addresses:

European Commission

Timothy Hall

Directorate General RTD

CDMA 2/173

B-1049 Brussels

Email addresses:

rtd-genomics-biotec@cec.eu.int or,

rtd-diseases@cec.eu.int

The request must be accompanied by an explanation of why the exception is being sought. Proposers wishing to use paper submission take the responsibility for ensuring that such requests for exemption and the associated procedures are completed in time for them to meet the call deadline.

All proposals for indirect RTD actions must contain two parts: the forms (Part A) and the content (Part B).

Proposals for indirect RTD actions may be prepared off-line or on-line and submitted on-line. Part B of proposals for indirect RTD actions can only be submitted in PDF (‘portable document format’, compatible with Adobe Version 3 or higher with embedded fonts). Compressed (‘zipped’) files will be excluded.

The EPSS software tool (for off-line or on-line usage) is available via the Cordis website www.cordis.lu.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions that are submitted on-line and which are incomplete, illegible or contain viruses will be excluded.

Versions of proposals for indirect RTD actions submitted on a removable electronic storage medium (eg, CD-ROM, diskette), by email or by fax will be excluded.

Any proposal for indirect RTD actions that has been allowed to be submitted on paper and which is incomplete will be excluded.

Further details on the various proposal submission procedures are given in Annex J of the Guidelines on Proposal Evaluation and Selection Procedures.

6.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions have to reach the Commission at the latest on the closure date and at the time specified in the call concerned. Proposals for indirect RTD actions arriving after this date and time will be excluded.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum number of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded.

This also applies regarding any additional eligibility criteria given in the work programme.

7.

In the case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date and time specified in the call concerned.

8.

If foreseen in the relevant call, proposals for indirect RTD actions could be evaluated in the framework of a future evaluation.

9.

In all correspondence relating to a call (e.g. when requesting information, or submitting a proposal for an indirect RTD action), proposers are invited to cite the relevant call identifier.


(1)  OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 1

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002)4789, as modified by C(2003)577, C(2003)955, C(2003)1952, C(2003)3543, C(2003)3555, C(2003)4609, C(2003)5183, C(2004)433, C(2004)2002, C(2004)2727, C(2004)3324, C(2004)4178, C(2004)5286, C(2005)27, C(2005)961, and C(2005)2076, all decisions unpublished.

(4)  OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23.

(5)  OJ L 248, of 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)  OJ L 357, of 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003)883 of 27/3/2003, as last modified by C(2004)1855 of 18.5.2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.


ANNEX 1

FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-6

Call information (Thematic call)

1.   Specific Programme: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

2.   Activity: Priority thematic area of research ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’.

3.   Call title: Thematic call in the area of ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-6

5.   Date of publication:

6.   Closure date: 9 November 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 381,6 million, broken down as follows:

8.   Areas called and Instruments: Proposals are invited in the following areas, which are described using activity codes only. For the full title and definition of topic, applicants must refer to the Work Programme (Section 1.3 Technical Content). The evaluation of proposals will be based on the full definition of topic as described in the Work Programme. For the topic the instrument to be used is indicated.

SSAs across Thematic Priority 1

9.   Minimum number of participants (2):

Instrument

Minimum number of participants

IP, NoE, STREP and CA

3 independent legal entities from 3 different MS or AS, with at least 2 MS or ACC.

SSA

1 legal entity from a MS or AS.

10.   Restriction on participation: None.

11.   Consortia agreements:

Participants in IP and NOE are required to conclude a consortium agreement.

Participants in STREP, CA and SSA resulting from this call are encouraged, but not required, to conclude a consortium agreement.

12.   Evaluation procedure:

The evaluation shall follow a single stage procedure;

Proposals will not be evaluated anonymously;

The evaluation process may involve ‘remote’ evaluation of proposals;

Applicants may be invited to discuss their proposal.

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable:

Evaluation results: expected to be available some 4 months after the closure date

Contract signature: it is estimated that the first contracts related to this call will come into force by the end of 2006.


(1)  IP = Integrated project; NOE = Network of excellence; STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action

(2)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = Associated States; ACC = Associated candidate countries.

Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participants may be the sole participant in an indirect action.


ANNEX 2

FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-7

Call information (STREPs dedicated to SMEs)

1.   Specific Programme: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

2.   Activity: Priority thematic area of research ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’.

3.   Call title: Call for STREPs dedicated to SMEs in the area of ‘Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health’.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2005-LIFESCIHEALTH-7

5.   Date of publication:

6.   Closure date: 9 November 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time).

7.   Total indicative budget: EUR 171 million, broken down as follows:

8.   Areas called and Instruments: Proposals are invited in the following areas, which are described using activity codes only. For the full titles and definition of areas, applicants must refer to the Work Programme (Section 1.3 Technical Content). The evaluation of proposals will be based on the full definition as described in the Work Programme.

9.   Minimum number of participants (2):

Instrument

Minimum number of participants

STREP

3 independent legal entities from 3 different MS or AS, with at least 2 MS or ACC.

10.   Restriction on participation: All consortia should aim at having 30-50 % of the requested EC contribution budget going to SMEs.

11.   Consortia agreements: Participants in STREP resulting from this call are encouraged, but not required, to conclude a consortium agreement.

12.   Evaluation procedure: The evaluation shall follow a single stage procedure;

Proposals will not be evaluated anonymously;

The evaluation process may involve ‘remote’ evaluation of proposals;

Applicants may be invited to discuss their proposal.

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable:

Evaluation results: expected to be available some 4 months after the closure date

Contract signature: it is estimated that the first contracts related to this call will come into force by the end of 2006.


(1)  STREP = Specific targeted research project.

(2)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = Associated States; ACC = Associated candidate countries.

Any legal entity established in a Member State or Associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participant may be the sole participant in an indirect action.


Top