22.12.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/24

1)

Unsolicited commercial communications by e-mail, otherwise known as ‘spam’, have reached worrying proportions, rising from an estimated 7 % of global e-mail traffic in 2001 to 50 % at the present time.

2)

Spam is a problem not only on grounds of privacy, deception of customers, protection of minors and human dignity, it also represents a commercial threat. It represents extra costs for businesses and lost productivity, and threatens to undermine consumer confidence.

3)

The EU adopted in July 2002 Directive 2002/58/EC on Privacy and Electronic Communications, introducing the principle of ‘opt-in’ for electronic mail, and the deadline for its implementation was 31 October 2003.

4)

While it is a first step, legislation alone will not be enough to combat the problem of spam. Further action is needed to ensure that the Directive has the desired effect.

1.1

agrees with the Commission's conclusion that spam is one of the most significant challenges facing the internet today, requiring not only effective enforcement and international co-operation, but also self regulatory and technical solutions by industry, and community awareness;

1.2

welcomes the Commission's continued efforts in encouraging Member States to transpose the Directive 2002/58/EC on Privacy and Electronic Communications and the assistance offered to Member States by the Commission and hopes that this assistance will also be extended to candidate countries post enlargement in May 2004;

1.3

notes that unsolicited email is causing a lack of confidence in information networks and that the volume of email traffic is causing systems to slow down. This is a cross-border and international issue and CoR has concerns that the Community's policy will only succeed with the agreement and cooperation of international organisations and other world powers;

1.4

regrets that the Commission does not recognise the ability of regional and local authorities to interface with their communities and the public at large and urges the Commission to take proper account of how much assistance regional and local authorities can give in combating unsolicited mail;

1.5

emphasises that regional and local authorities can be involved in tackling spam in a variety of different ways. They have a role in terms of raising awareness and disseminating information, and in a more general sense by virtue of their closeness to citizens, organisations and businesses;

1.6

notes that it has already proposed that measures should be taken to inform schoolchildren of both the security aspects of the information society and the consequences of computer-related crime;

1.7

notes that regional and local authorities have a public protection role in the widest sense;

1.8

recognises that regional and local authorities have an important role in ensuring a balanced development of the knowledge and information society in the European Union, particularly post enlargement, in order to enhance economic and social cohesion in regions, cities and districts throughout Europe. Regional and local authorities are in a unique position to ensure that the widest possible access to Community actions is achieved, with a particular focus on disadvantaged groups;

1.9

recognises that local and regional government has the responsibility to develop not only online public services, but also information and communication technologies (ICT) in lifelong learning (given that digital literacy is considered a new basic skill) and health care. Local and regional government is also active in promoting information security, in developing online culture and tourism-content services, in improving access to online services and, of course, in developing the interoperability of processes both within government and between organisations in general. It believes therefore that it is vital that effective and unfettered electronic communication is achieved.

2.1

calls for the active involvement of candidate countries to be stressed. The Internet does not recognise traditional borders between states and therefore actions taken at the European level should not limit themselves to the participation of the EU Member States. The effects of the lack of information system and network security in the less developed regions of Europe may widen the digital gap between them and the most developed and secure regions;

2.2

proposes that efforts should be made to secure a greater commitment on the part of the main world software manufacturers to undertake research on network and information safety and its immediate practical application. Security should be a priority issue among the telecommunications service and access providers operating in Europe, and more links to activities and organisations outside the EU should also be developed;

2.3

urges the Commission to use the ability of Regional and Local Authorities to communicate with citizens at a local level. For example, Libraries, Community Centres and other Municipal buildings offer great opportunities to raise awareness and offer public access to information. These facilities offer direct contact with the public including disadvantaged groups;

2.4

proposes that many of the problems associated with a safe use of the Internet could be resolved at a local level, in particular by an intensive education drive designed to raise awareness on this matter. Regional and local authorities can signpost information regarding combating unsolicited mail;

2.5

proposes that schools, given their responsibility for education, should adopt measures to inform young people of the security aspects of the information society;

2.6

proposes that regional and local authorities use their existing relationships with business organisations to encourage them to take positive action against spam;

2.7

wishes also to emphasise the importance of cooperation within the EU, and in particular the role of regional and local government in ensuring that cooperation.