This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52014XX1018(02)
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2) — Rapporteur: Belgium
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2) — Rapporteur: Belgium
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2) — Rapporteur: Belgium
OJ C 371, 18.10.2014, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 05/11/2010
- Author:
- Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
- Form:
- Opinion
- Legal basis:
-
- 32003R0001 - A23P2PTA)
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
- Subject matter:
- Directory code:
-
- 08.20.10.00 Competition policy / Restrictive practices / Prohibited agreements
|
18.10.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/8 |
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2)
Rapporteur: Belgium
(2014/C 371/07)
|
1. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1). A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
2. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for each addressee of the draft decision. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
3. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the adjustments to the basic amounts applicable in this case for each addressee of the draft decision. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
4. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
5. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
6. |
The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
7. |
The Advisory Committee asks the European Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
|
8. |
The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain. |
