EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0367
Case T-367/17: Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
Case T-367/17: Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
Case T-367/17: Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
OJ C 249, 31.7.2017, p. 45–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 249/45 |
Action brought on 09 June 2017 — Linak v EUIPO — ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Shape of electrically operated lifting column)
(Case T-367/17)
(2017/C 249/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design ‘Electrically operated lifting column’ — Community design No 101 159-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 in Case R 1411/2015-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the Applicant. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002. |