EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CB0551

Case C-551/14 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Arctic Paper Mochenwangen GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Article 10a — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 — Decision 2011/278/EU — National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany — Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances — Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ — Implementing powers of the Commission)

OJ C 454, 5.12.2016, p. 6–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

5.12.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/6


Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2016 — Arctic Paper Mochenwangen GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-551/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Article 10a - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances from 2013 - Decision 2011/278/EU - National implementation measures submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany - Rejection of the registration of certain installations on the lists of installations receiving free allocations of emission allowances - Provision relating to cases of ‘undue hardship’ - Implementing powers of the Commission))

(2016/C 454/13)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Arctic Paper Mochenwangen GmbH (represented by: S. Kobes and B. Burkert, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Arctic Paper Mochenwangen GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.


(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.


Top