-
62008TJ0442
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 April 2013.
International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) v European Commission.
Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copyright relating to public performance of musical works via the internet, satellite and cable retransmission - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Sharing of the geographic market - Bilateral agreements between national collecting societies - Concerted practices precluding the possibility of granting multi-territory and multi-repertoire licences - Proof - Presumption of innocence.
Case T-442/08.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62011TJ0087
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013.
GRP Security v Court of Auditors of the European Union.
Case T-87/11.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62011TJ0092
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2013.
Jørgen Andersen v European Commission.
State aid - Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking DSB - Public service contracts for the supply of passenger rail transport services between Copenhagen and Ystad - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to conditions - Temporal application of rules of substantive law.
Case T-92/11.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0415
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 March 2013.
Nexans France v European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy.
Case T-415/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62012TO0064
Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 March 2013.
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and Henkel France v European Commission.
Action for annulment - Request seeking to obtain the transmission to the French competition authority of certain documents contained in the Commission’s file relating to competition proceedings concerning the European market for consumer detergents - Use in the context of national proceedings concerning the French detergents sector - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility.
Case T-64/12.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0539
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 March 2013.
Acino AG v European Commission.
Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and Directive 2001/83/EC.
Case T-539/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0096
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, extended composition) of 7 March 2013.
Rütgers Germany GmbH and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).
REACH - Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality.
Case T-96/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0095
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, extended composition) of 7 March 2013.
Cindu Chemicals BV and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).
REACH - Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality.
Case T-95/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0094
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, extended composition) of 7 March 2013.
Rütgers Germany GmbH and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).
REACH - Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality.
Case T-94/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
-
62010TJ0093
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, extended composition) of 7 March 2013.
Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).
REACH - Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality.
Case T-93/10.
European Court Reports 2013 Page 00000
