Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION opening and providing for the administration of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands from 2014 to 2020 /* COM/2013/0552 final - 2013/0266 (CNS) */
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Context of the proposal Grounds for and objectives of the
proposal Artcile 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No
645/2008 of 8 July 2008 opening and providing for the administration of
autonomous Community tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products into
the Canary Islands. The government of the Kingdom of Spain has made a request
the prolongation of the measures under the aformentioned regulation. The exceptional geographical situation of the
Canary Islands in relation to the sources of supply of fishery products which
are essential for domestic consumption entails costs that are a severe burden
for this sector. The negative effects of this natural handicap can be remedied
by temporarily suspending customs duties on imports of the products in question
from third countries. The proposed reductions in import duties, in combination
with other measures specific for the outermost regions, will help the Canary Islands to overcome the structural difficulties they face. General context The Canary Islands are one of the outermost regions
of the European Union, for which special measures may be foreseen, pursuant to
Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in order to
overcome the economic disadvantages these regions suffer due to their
geographical situation. Since 1991 the European Union has suspended,
partially or in full, the Common Custom Tariff duties on imports of certain
fishery products into the Canary Islands. The following regulations were
adopted in the past to suspend duties on imports of fish products into the Canary Islands: a) Council Regulation (EEC) 1911/91 of 26
June 1991 on the application of the provisions of Community law to the Canary Islands. b) Council Regulation (EEC) 3621/92 of 14
December 1992 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff
duties on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands; c) Council Regulation (EC) 704/2002 of 25
March 2002 temporarily suspending autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on
imports of certain industrial products and opening and providing for the
administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas on imports of certain
fishery products into the Canary Islands, and d) Council Regulation (EC) 645/2008 of 08
July 2008 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community
tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands. Existing provisions on autonomous
tariff reductions Council Regulation (EC) No 645/2008 of 8 July
2008 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community
tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands
expires on 31 December 2013. Similar tariff reductions (suspensions) apply
on imports of certain industrial products into the Canary Islands.for the Canary Islands. They are implemented with Council Regulation (EU) No 1386/2011 of 19
December 2011 temporarily suspending autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on
imports of certain industrial products. Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 of the European
Parliament and of the Council, of 13 March 2013, laying down specific measures
for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and repealing Council
Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 of 30 January 2006, i.e. the so called
"POSEI" Regulation, includes specific supply arrangements aimed at
mitigating the additional costs for the supply of essential products for human
consumption, for processing and as agricultural inputs. As part of this supply
arrangements imports of certain agrcultural products from third countries are
exempted from duties. This regulation applies to all the regions mentioned in
Article 349 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, including the Canary Islands. Consistency with the other policies
and objectives of the Union The proposed duty free tariff quotas are to
be seen, in terms of support to the Canary Islands' fish industry, as
complementing other measures, in particular the scheme to compensate for the
additional costs incurred in the marketing of certain fishery products from the
outermost regions (Council Regulation (EC) 791/2007 of 21 May 2007). This proposal is also
in line with Union policies, in particular the Common Fisheries Policy. Consultation of interested parties and
impact assessment Consultation of interested parties Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) 645/2008
specified that the Spanish authorities had to submit two implementation reports
(in May 2010 and in May 2012) and required the Commission to assess the impact
of the measures following the receipt of these reports. The Spanish authorities fulfilled the above
mentioned reporting obligations and submitted two reports: one in July 2010 and
another in June 2012. The Commission requested additional information necessary
to carry out the examination of the impacts of the measures, as required by the
Regulation. The information requested was provided by the Spanish authorities,
allowing the Commission to complete the examination of the measures. Collection and use of expertise The evaluation report[1] on the compensation regime
implemented with Council Regulation (EC) 791/2007 was also used in the
assessment. This evaluation report provides relevant information on the Canary Islands on areas that are of relevance when examining the impacts of the tariff
quotas (e.g. population, structure of the fisheries sector, production,
processing and marketing of fish.) This report also addressed the possible
interactions between the tariff quotas for fish products and the compensation
regime as applied in the Canary Islands with Council Regulation (EC) 791/2007. The 2009 evaluation report[2] of the POSEI programmes and
specific measures in favour of the smaller Aegean islands was also used. This
report, besides presenting factual information about the Canary Islands'
economy, provided an analysis of the interaction between measures allowing for
duty free imports of certain agricultural products and EU financial support of
local agriculture. Impact assessment Owing to the very
limited scope of the measures and the fact that the proposal concerns the
continuation of measures that have been applied in the past there is no added
value to carry out an impact assessment. The examination of the
reports by the Spanish authorities provided the necessary basis for the preparation
of the Commission proposal. Legal elements of the proposal Summary of the proposed action To extend the existing
autonomous tariff quotas for another 7 year period, i.e. from 2014 to 2020.
This 7 year period synchronises the measures with other actions of the Union in
favour of the Canary Islands, in particular those proposed in the context of
the Commission's poposal for a European Maritime and Fisheries Fund[3]. Legal basis Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union. Subsidiarity principle The proposal falls under the exclusive
competence of the Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply. Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle for the following reasons: The proposed tariff quotas would cover the
needs of the Canary Islands' domestic market, while ensuring that flows of
reduced-duty imports into the Union remain predictable and clearly
identifiable. The suspension of duties only applies to
certain fishery products, for a limited volume and for a limited period. The
effects of the measures are also circumscribed as the products are intended
solely for the Canary island's market. The administrative burden for both Member
States' national and regional authorities and the Commission services is kept
to a minimum, especially with regard to the reports to be submitted on the
implementation of the measures. Choice of instruments Proposed instruments: Regulation. The Treaty does no allow any other means for
the implementation of such measures. Budgetary implication The proposal has
implications for the Union budget since the duty suspensions will lead to loss
in revenue of the Union's own resources. Additional information The proposal includes a
review clause. The proposal includes a
sunset clause. 2013/0266 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION opening and providing for the
administration of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union on imports of certain
fishery products into the Canary Islands from 2014 to 2020 THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 349 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments, Having regard to the opinion of the
European Parliament[4],
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[5],
Having regard to the opinion of the
Committee of the Regions[6],
Acting in accordance with a special
legislative procedure, Whereas: (1) The exceptional
geographical situation of the Canary Islands in relation to the sources of
supply of certain fishery products which are essential for domestic consumption
entails additional costs for this sector. This natural handicap, as recognised
in Article 349 of the Treaty, resulting from insularity, remoteness and
outermost location can be remedied, inter alia, by temporarily suspending
customs duties on imports of the products in question from third countries
within Union autonomous tariff quotas of an appropriate volume. (2) Council Regulation (EC) No 645/2008[7] opened and provided for the administration
of autonomous Community tariff quotas on imports of certain fishery products
into the Canary Islands for the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013. (3) In September 2012 Spain requested the extension of Union tariff quotas on
imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands in accordance with
Article 349 of the Treaty. (4) The Spanish authorities
submitted in July 2010 and June 2012 reports on implementation of the measures
referred in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 645/2008. The Commission has
examined the impact of the measures on the basis of the aforementioned reports. (5) The reports submitted by
the Spanish authorities included information on the utilisation rate of the
tariff quotas for the period 2007-2011. This information showed that, on
average, over the aforementioned period, the tariff quota with order number
09.2997 was almost fully utilised and that the tariff quota with order number
09.2651 was not exhausted. (6) Since the tariff quota
with order number 09.2997 was almost fully utilised and the non-exhaustion of
the tariff quota with order number 09.2651 could be linked to temporary and exogenous
factors, it is appropriate to set the quantity of the quotas at the same level. (7) The sharp decline in local
demand for products covered by tariff quota 09.2651, due to the difficult economic
conditions in the Canary Islands following the economic and financial crises,
might explain the underutilisation of this quota. (8) Tariff quotas similar to
those opened with Council Regulation (EC) No 645/2008 for certain fishery
products are warranted because they would cover the needs of the Canary
Islands' domestic market, while ensuring that flows of reduced-duty imports
into the Union remain predictable and clearly identifiable. (9) Therefore, with the aim of
giving a long term perspective to economic operators to reach a level of
activities which stabilises the economic and social environment on the islands,
it is appropriate to extend, for an additional period, the autonomous tariff
quota of the Common Customs Tariff duties for certain goods as detailed in the
Annex of Regulation (EC) No 645/2008. (10) In order to avoid
undermining the integrity and the coherence of the internal market, measures
should be taken to ensure that fishery products for which suspension is granted
are intended solely for the Canary Islands’ domestic market. (11) Measures should be taken to
ensure that the Commission is kept regularly informed of the volume of imports
in question so that, if necessary, it can take steps to prevent any speculative
movement or deflection of trade. (12) In order to ensure uniform
conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers
should be conferred on the Commission allowing the Commission to temporarily
withdraw the suspension in case of a deflection of trade. Those powers should
be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and
general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the
Commission's exercise of implementing powers[8]. (13) The provisions to be
adopted should ensure continuity with the measures set out in Regulation (EC) No 645/2008,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 1. From 1 January 2014 to 31
December 2020, the Common Customs Tariff duties applicable to imports into the Canary Islands of the fishery products listed in the Annex shall be suspended in full for
the quantity indicated in the Annex. 2. The suspension referred to
in paragraph 1 shall be granted exclusively for products intended for the Canary Islands' domestic market. It shall only apply to fishery products which are unloaded
from ship or aircraft before the customs declaration for release into free
circulation is submitted to the customs authorities in the Canary Islands. Article 2 The tariff quotas referred to in Article 1
shall be managed in accordance with Articles 308a, 308b and 308c (1) of Commission
Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the
implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the
Community Customs Code [9].
Article 3 By 30 June 2019, the Commission shall
examine the impact of the measures provided for in Article 1 and, on the basis
of its findings, submit any relevant proposals for the period after 2020. Article 4 1. Where the Commission has
reasons to believe that the suspensions laid down in this Regulation have led
to a deflection of trade for a specific product it may adopt implementing acts,
temporarily withdrawing the suspension for a period not longer than 12 months.
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination
procedure referred to in Article 5(2). Import duties for products for which the
suspension has been temporarily withdrawn shall be secured by a guarantee, and
the release of the products concerned for free circulation in the Community of
the Canary Islands shall be conditional upon the provision of such guarantee. 2. Within the 12 month period
referred to in paragraph 1, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and
after consulting the European Parliament should adopt a definitive decision as
to whether maintain or withdraw the suspension. If the suspension is withdrawn,
the amounts of duties secured by guarantees shall be collected definitively. 3. If no definitive decision
has been adopted within the 12 month period in accordance with paragraph 2 the
securities shall be released. Article 5 1. The Commission shall be
assisted by the Customs Code Committee, established by Article 247a (1) of
Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92[10].
That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No
182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to
this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Article 6 The Commission and customs authorities of
Member States shall cooperate closely to ensure the proper management and control
of the application of this Regulation. Article 7 This Regulation shall enter into force on
the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union. It shall apply from 1 January 2014 to 31
December 2020. This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, For
the Council The
President ANNEX Order No. || CN Code || Description || Amount of quota (in tons) || Quota duty (%) 09.2997 || 0303 || Fish, frozen, excluding fish fillets and other fish meat of heading 0304 || 15 000 || 0 0304 || Fish fillets and other fish meat (whether or not minced), fresh, chilled or frozen 09.2651 || 0306 || Crustaceans, whether in shell or not, live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; smoked crustaceans whether in shell or not, whether or not cooked before or during the smoking process; crustaceans, in shell, cooked by steaming or by boiling in water, whether or not chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; flours, meals and pellets of crustaceans, fit for human consumption || 15 000 || 0 0307 || Molluscs, whether in shell or not, live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; smoked molluscs whether in shell or not, whether or not cooked before or during the smoking process; flours, meals and pellets of molluscs, fit for human consumption 0308 || Aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs, live, fresh, chilled, frozen, dried, salted or in brine; smoked aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs whether or not cooked before or during the smoking process; flours, meals and pellets of aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs, fit for human consumption LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSALS HAVING A BUDGETARY IMPACT EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED TO THE REVENUE SIDE 1. NAME OF THE PROPOSAL: Proposal for a Council Regulation opening and
providing for the administration of autonomous Union tariff quotas on imports
of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands. 2. BUDGET LINES: Chapter and Article: Chap. 12 art. 120 Amount budgeted for the year 2013: € 18,631,800,000 3. FINANCIAL IMPACT ¨ Proposal has no financial implications X Proposal has no financial impact on
expenditure but has a financial impact on revenue – the effect is as follows: (€ million to one decimal place) || || Budget line || Revenue || period, starting dd/mm/aaaa || [Year 2014-2020] Article 120 || Impact on own resources || 01/01/2014 - 31/12/2020 || -9.1/year 4. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES Provisions on the management of tariff quotas
include the measures necessary for preventing fraud and irregularities (application
of the controls provided for in the Community Customs Code and its implementing
provisions) 5. OTHER REMARKS Estimated cost of this
operation Method of calculating total
cost of operation Taking most recent complete
statistics (2012) as a basis, the yearly loss of revenue resulting from this
Regulation may therefore be estimated at 12.1 MEUR (see table
hereunder). The amount stated has, in general, been calculated on the basis of
MFN duty rates and marks a maximum level due to the fact that the Union applies lower duties to imports from a number of countries. Therefore the actual loss
of revenue tends to result in lower amounts since MFN duties do not apply
constantly. Order No || Quota volume (tonnes) || Estimated price (€/tonne) || MFN duty (%) || Quota duty (%) || Duties foregone per year (€) 09.2997 || 15,000 t || 3,076 || 11 (average duty) || 0 || 5,076,052 09.2651 || 15,000 t || 4,547 || 10.3 (average duty) || 0 || 7,025,452 Total || || || || || 12,101,503 Total loss of revenue compared to the absence
of the tariff quotas is estimated at: € 12,101,503. The loss of revenue in Traditional Own
Resources shall be compensated by Member States contributions based on the GNI. [1] "Evaluation des mesures prévues dans les régions
ultrapériphériques sous le reg (ce) N° 791/2007- Rapport final" - Juillet
2012 – MARE contract MARE/2010/11. Under publication. [2] "Evaluation des mesures mises en oeuvre en
faveur des régions ultrapériphériques (POSEI) et des petites îles de la mer
Egée dans le cadre de la politique agricole commune" Contrat N°30-CE –
0233430/0094. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/posei/index_fr.htm [3] Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund [repealing
Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 and Council Regulation(EC) No 861/2006 and
Council Regulation No XXX/2011 on integrated maritime policy. COM(2011) 804
final of 02.12.2011 [4] OJ C , , p. . [5] OJ C , , p. . [6] OJ C , , p. . [7] OJ L 180, 9.7.2008, p. 1. [8] OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13. [9] OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1 [10] OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1.