3.2.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 36/33 |
Action brought on 5 November 2019 – GY v ECB
(Case T-746/19)
(2020/C 36/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: GY (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the ECB’s decision of 28 January 2019 refusing the applicant the household allowance for the year 2019; |
— |
annul further, if need be, the decisions of 24 April 2019 and 26 August 2019 respectively rejecting the applicant’s request for administrative review and the applicant’s grievance procedure; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:
1. |
First plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of non-discrimination. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of acquired rights. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging violation of the ‘effet utile’ of the household allowance and of Article 15 of the Conditions of Employment of the ECB. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of the duty of care. |