Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)

(Case T-607/19)

(2019/C 372/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Application for registration No. 17 946 879

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 in Case R 830/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—	annul the contested decision;

—	order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—	Failure to take into account the inherent distinctive character of the mark FAKE DUCK;

—	Failure to take into account the complexity of the mark FAKE DUCK and the picture of an egg;

—	Misapplication of the principle of equal treatment;

—	Misapplication of the principle of legality.