12.2.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 52/39 |
Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Nerantzaki v Commission
(Case T-813/17)
(2018/C 052/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eleni Nerantzaki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the EPSO selection board of 7 March 2017 not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/331/16; |
— |
annul the decision of the appointing authority Ares(2017)s. 4916702 of 14 September 2017, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision not to admit the applicant to open competition EPSO/AD/331/16; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the applicant’s legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the present application. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by the defendant in the assessment of the applicant’s professional qualifications. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the notice of competition EPSO/AD/331/16. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging inadequate and contradictory reasoning such as to constitute a breach both of Article 25 and of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations. |