16.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 14/22 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 October 2016 — Salzburger Gebietskrankenkasse, Bundesminister für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz
(Case C-527/16)
(2017/C 014/28)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Salzburger Gebietskrankenkasse and Bundesminister für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz
Interveners: Alpenrind GmbH, Martin-Meat Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft, Martimpex-Meat Kft, Pensionsversicherungsanstalt and Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt
Questions referred
1. |
Does Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, (1) which establishes the binding effect of documents within the meaning of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009, also apply in proceedings before a court within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU? |
2. |
If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:
|
3. |
In the event that, under certain conditions, the binding effect of documents within the meaning of Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 is limited: Does it contravene the prohibition on replacement set forth in Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 if the replacement occurs not in the form of a posting by the same employer but instead by another employer? Does it matter whether
|