16.6.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 184/18 |
Appeal brought on 8 April 2014 by European Dynamics Belgium and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2014 in Case T-158/12 European Dynamics Belgium and Others v EMA
(Case C-173/14 P)
2014/C 184/22
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellants: European Dynamics Belgium SA, European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics UK Ltd (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMA)
Form of order sought
The appellants claim that the Court should:
— |
Set aside the judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2014 in Case Τ-158/12 and refer the case back to the General Court for judgment; |
— |
Order the EMA to pay the costs. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
1. |
The appellants submit that the judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2014 in Case Τ-158/12 contains findings of law which are manifestly contrary to rules of European Union law and are contested in this appeal. |
2. |
In the opinion of the appellants, the judgment under appeal should be set aside on the ground of a manifest error of assessment, on the ground of a distortion of the appellants’ arguments, on the ground of a defective statement of reasons and on the ground of misinterpretation and misapplication of European Union law. |
3. |
Specifically, the appellants put forward four grounds of appeal:
|