English edition | | Information and Notices | | |
|
Notice No | Contents | page | |
| | | IV Notices | |
| | | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | | Court of Justice of the European Union |
2012/C 138/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union
OJ C 133, 5.5.2012 | 1 |
| |
|
| | | V Announcements | |
| | | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | | Court of Justice |
2012/C 138/02 | Case C-59/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 6 February 2012 — BKK Mobil Oil, a body governed by public law v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V. | 2 |
2012/C 138/03 | Case C-82/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 16 February 2012 — Transportes Jordi Besora, S.L. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC) and Generalitat de Catalunya | 2 |
2012/C 138/04 | Case C-86/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Adzo Domenyo Alopka, Jarel Mondoulou, Eja Mondoulou v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration | 3 |
2012/C 138/05 | Case C-87/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 20 February 2012 — Kreshnik Ymerag, Kasim Ymeraga, Afijete Ymeraga-Tafarshiku, Kushtrim Ymeraga, Labinot Ymeraga v Minister for Labour, Employment and Immigration | 3 |
2012/C 138/06 | Case C-96/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 February 2012 — Domingos Freitas and Maria Adília Monteiro Pinto v Companhia de Seguros Allianz Portugal SA | 4 |
2012/C 138/07 | Case C-99/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Eurofit SA v Bureau d’intervention et de restitution belge (BIRB) | 4 |
2012/C 138/08 | Case C-104/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 29 February 2012 — Finanzamt Köln-Nord v Wolfram Becker | 5 |
2012/C 138/09 | Case C-114/12: Action brought on 1 March 2012 — European Commission v Council of the European Union | 5 |
2012/C 138/10 | Case C-115/12 P: Appeal brought on 5 March 2012 by the French Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-488/10 France v Commission | 6 |
2012/C 138/11 | Case C-116/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Trimeles Protodikeio Serron (Greece) lodged on 5 March 2012 — Ioannis Khristodoulou, Nikolaos Khristodoulou, AFI N. Khristodoulou SA v Greek State | 7 |
2012/C 138/12 | Case C-132/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonpunt and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-203/10 Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission | 7 |
2012/C 138/13 | Case C-133/12 P: Appeal brought on 9 March 2012 by Stichting Woonlinie and Others against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-202/10 Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission | 8 |
2012/C 138/14 | Case C-134/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 12 March 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members — public officials with a special status — police serving with the IPJ Tulcea) v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Tulcea | 8 |
2012/C 138/15 | Case C-145/12 P: Appeal brought on 26 March 2012 by Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 9 January 2012 in Case T-407/09 Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH v European Commission | 9 |
2012/C 138/16 | Case C-148/12: Action brought on 26 March 2012 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany | 10 |
| | | General Court |
2012/C 138/17 | Case T-243/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poland v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC) | 11 |
2012/C 138/18 | Case T-247/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Slovakia v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted on account of the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC) | 11 |
2012/C 138/19 | Case T-248/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Czech Republic v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted due to the accession of new Member States — Act of Accession of 2003 — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary legislation — Decision 2007/361/EC) | 12 |
2012/C 138/20 | Case T-262/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Lithuania v Commission (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC) | 12 |
2012/C 138/21 | Case T-336/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Spanish markets for access to broadband internet — Decision declaring an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Definition of the markets — Dominant position — Abuse — Calculation of the margin squeeze — Effects of the abuse — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence — Subsidiarity — Proportionality — Legal certainty — Sincere cooperation — Principle of sound administration — Fines) | 13 |
2012/C 138/22 | Case T-398/07: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Spain v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Spanish broadband internet access markets — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Price-fixing — Margin squeeze — Sincere cooperation — Ultra vires application of Article 82 EC — Legal certainty — Protection of legitimate expectations) | 13 |
2012/C 138/23 | Case T-214/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Rehbein v OHIM — Dias Martinho (OUTBURST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark OUTBURST — Earlier national word mark OUTBURST — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95) | 14 |
2012/C 138/24 | Case T-296/08: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung v Commission (Aid granted under the INTI programme — Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary — Errors of assessment) | 14 |
2012/C 138/25 | Case T-41/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé (Bebio) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Bebio — Earlier Community word mark and international word mark BEBA — Partial refusal of registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 14 |
2012/C 138/26 | Case T-123/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Ryanair v European Commission (State aid — Loan granted to an airline company and capable of being counted as own capital — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Sale of assets of an airline company — Decision finding no aid at the conclusion of the preliminary examination phase — Actions for annulment — Locus standi — Interested party — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Jurisdiction — Duty to state reasons) | 15 |
2012/C 138/27 | Case T-417/09: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Poslovni Sistem Mercator v OHIM — Mercator Multihull (MERCATOR STUDIOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MERCATOR STUDIOS — Earlier national and international figurative marks Mercator and Mercator Slovenska košarica — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No injury to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 15 |
2012/C 138/28 | Case T-111/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Portugal v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Operational Programme seeking modernisation of the economic fabric in Portugal — Absence of precise and verifiable binding objectives — Legitimate expectations) | 16 |
2012/C 138/29 | Case T-190/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Egan and Hackett v Parliament (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Registers of assistants to former members of the European Parliament — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001) | 16 |
2012/C 138/30 | Case T-369/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — You-Q BV v OHIM — Apple Corps (BEATLE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BEATLE — Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks BEATLES and THE BEATLES — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation of the earlier marks) | 16 |
2012/C 138/31 | Case T-547/10: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Omya v OHIM — Alpha Calcit (CALCIMATT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CALCIMATT — Prior Community word mark CALCILAN — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Refusal of registration) | 17 |
2012/C 138/32 | Case T-242/11: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Kaltenbach & Voigt v OHIM (3D eXam) (Community trade mark — International registration — Request for territorial extension of protection — Figurative mark 3D eXam — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character and lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 17 |
2012/C 138/33 | Case T-453/10: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2012 — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v Commission (Action for annulment — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure incurred by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Expenditure excluded from European Union financing — Devolved administration — No direct concern — Inadmissibility) | 17 |
2012/C 138/34 | Case T-106/12: Action brought on 29 February 2012 — Cytochroma Development v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN) | 18 |
2012/C 138/35 | Case T-117/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission | 18 |
2012/C 138/36 | Case T-118/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ANKO v Commission | 19 |
2012/C 138/37 | Case T-125/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission | 19 |
| | | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
2012/C 138/38 | Case F-56/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Strobl v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of equality — Age discrimination) | 21 |
2012/C 138/39 | Case F-70/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Commission (Civil service — Appointment — Successful candidate in a competition published before the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations but finalised afterwards — Grading under new, less favourable rules) | 21 |
2012/C 138/40 | Case F-93/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Mische v Parliament (Civil service — Appointment — Recruitment and simultaneous transfer to another institution — Grading under new, less favourable rules — Admissibility of the action — Interest in bringing an action — Action out of time) | 22 |
2012/C 138/41 | Case F-18/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Mohamed Merhzaoui v Council of the European Union (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Classification in grade — Local staff appointed as officials — Article 10 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 3 of the annex to the CEOS — Promotion exercise for 2008 — Consideration of comparative merits of officials attached to the career stream AST — Procedure based on staff reports 2005/2006 — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised) | 22 |
2012/C 138/42 | Case F-20/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2011 — Juvyns v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2008 promotion procedure — Comparative examination of merit — Procedure based on 2005/2006 annual staff reports — Criterion of the level of responsibilities exercised) | 22 |
2012/C 138/43 | Case F-19/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — Marsili v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Evaluation of the oral test — Composition of the selection board) | 23 |
2012/C 138/44 | Case F-27/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 March 2011 — Begue and Others v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Staff entitled to an allowance for regular stand-by duty — Article 55 and Article 56b of the Staff Regulations — Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 495/77) | 23 |
2012/C 138/45 | Case F-28/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 — Mioni v Commission (Staff cases — Contractual agents — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Habitual residence prior to taking up duties) | 23 |
2012/C 138/46 | Case F-72/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — da Silva Tenreiro v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 29(1)(a) and (b) of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Statement of reasons) | 24 |
2012/C 138/47 | Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof) | 24 |
2012/C 138/48 | Case F-80/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — AJ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Articles 43 and 45 of the Staff Regulations — Appraisal report — Manifest error of assessment — Statement of reasons) | 24 |
2012/C 138/49 | Case F-81/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2011 — Praskevicius v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment — Merit points — Consideration of comparative merits — Statement of reasons) | 25 |
2012/C 138/50 | Case F-89/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Education costs — Definition) | 25 |
2012/C 138/51 | Case F-100/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 February 2012 — AM v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Insurance against accidents and occupational disease — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Refusal to recognise the accidental cause of a stroke — Medical committee — Principle of collegiality) | 25 |
2012/C 138/52 | Case F-113/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2012 — AT v EACEA (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Evaluation report — Definitive nature — Time-limit for bringing an action — Out of time — Early termination of fixed-term employment contract on ground of incompetence — Review by the courts — Manifest error of assessment) | 26 |
2012/C 138/53 | Case F-114/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Bowles, Larue and Whitehead v ECB (Staff case — Staff of the ECB — General adjustment to salaries — Method of calculation — Provisional data — Economic and financial crisis — Special circumstances — Act adversely affecting an official — Pay slip — Provisional act) | 26 |
2012/C 138/54 | Case F-119/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2011 — Di Tullio v Commission (Civil service — Temporary staff — Leave for national service — Article 18 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Professional soldier — Completion of a period of territorial command — Refusal) | 26 |
2012/C 138/55 | Case F-121/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Michael Heath v ECB (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Pension scheme — Pension plan — Annual pension increase — Harmonised index of consumer prices — Opinion of pension plan actuary — Consultation of staff committee — Consultation of oversight committee — Right to negotiate by collective agreement) | 27 |
2012/C 138/56 | Case F-123/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 February 2012 — Bancale and Buccheri v Commission (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Internal competitions — Conditions for admission — Professional experience acquired after obtaining the diploma — Diploma — Qualifications obtained before obtaining the diploma — Equivalence) | 27 |
2012/C 138/57 | Case F-36/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2012 — BD v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Non-extension of employment contract — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Conflict of interest — Relationship of trust — Article 12b of the Staff Regulations — Outside activity — Presumption of innocence) | 27 |
2012/C 138/58 | Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points) | 28 |
2012/C 138/59 | Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure) | 28 |
2012/C 138/60 | Case F-32/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Wilk v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the temporary staff — Reimbursement of expenses — Installation allowance — Installation with family at the place of employment — Recovery of undue payments — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 28 |
2012/C 138/61 | Case F-46/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission (No need to adjudicate) | 29 |
2012/C 138/62 | Case F-57/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pedeferri and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure) | 29 |
2012/C 138/63 | Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility) | 29 |
2012/C 138/64 | Case F-67/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages relating to the taxation of costs — Inadmissibility) | 30 |
2012/C 138/65 | Case F-69/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in that case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure) | 30 |
2012/C 138/66 | Case F-107/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice (Civil service — Delay — Manifest inadmissibility) | 30 |
2012/C 138/67 | Case F-108/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 July 2011 — Filice and others v Court of Justice (Civil service — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff — No need to adjudicate) | 30 |
2012/C 138/68 | Case F-18/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Zaffino v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with the preliminary procedure) | 31 |
2012/C 138/69 | Case F-19/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Galvan v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure) | 31 |
2012/C 138/70 | Case F-20/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Bracalente v Commission (Civil service — Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union — Action — Manifestly inadmissible — Failure to comply with preliminary procedure) | 31 |
2012/C 138/71 | Case F-21/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Pirri v Commission (Civil Service — Person claiming the status of official or other servant of the European Union — Action — Manifest inadmissibility — failure to observe the pre-contentious procedure) | 31 |
2012/C 138/72 | Case F-85/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2011 — Wendelboe v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Refusal to promote an official — Transfer between institutions during the promotion year in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Complaint — Delay — Inadmissibility) | 32 |
2012/C 138/73 | Case F-12/12: Action brought on 27 January 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 32 |
2012/C 138/74 | Case F-13/12: Action brought on 3 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 32 |
2012/C 138/75 | Case F-14/12: Action brought on 4 February 2012 — ZZ v European Court of Auditors | 33 |
2012/C 138/76 | Case F-16/12: Action brought on 10 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 33 |
2012/C 138/77 | Case F-17/12: Action brought on 8 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 33 |
2012/C 138/78 | Case F-18/12: Action brought on 9 February 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission | 34 |
2012/C 138/79 | Case F-19/12: Action brought on 13 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 34 |
2012/C 138/80 | Case F-20/12: Action brought on 15 February 2012 — ZZ v EIGE | 35 |
2012/C 138/81 | Case F-22/12: Action brought on 17th February 2012 — ZZ v Commission and CEPOL | 35 |
2012/C 138/82 | Case F-23/12: Action brought on 20 February 2012 — ZZ and Others v Commission | 35 |
2012/C 138/83 | Case F-24/12: Action brought on 27 February 2012 — ZZ v Parliament | 36 |
2012/C 138/84 | Case F-25/12: Action brought on 21 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 36 |
2012/C 138/85 | Case F-30/12: Action brought on 5 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 36 |
2012/C 138/86 | Case F-32/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission | 36 |
2012/C 138/87 | Case F-35/12: Action brought on 14 March 2012 — ZZ v BEREC | 37 |
2012/C 138/88 | Case F-38/12: Action brought on 19th March 2012 — ZZ v FRA | 37 |
2012/C 138/89 | Case F-39/12: Action brought on 19 March 2012 — ZZ v Court of Auditors | 38 |
2012/C 138/90 | Case F-41/12: Action brought on 21 March 2012 — ZZ v Parliament | 38 |
2012/C 138/91 | Case F-138/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2011 — Van Arum v Parliament | 39 |
2012/C 138/92 | Case F-76/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 April 2011 — Behmer v Parliament | 39 |
2012/C 138/93 | Case F-24/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 February 2012 — Wagner-Leclercq v Council | 39 |
2012/C 138/94 | Case F-18/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 — Capidis v Commission | 39 |
2012/C 138/95 | Case F-24/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 11 March 2011 — Kaskarelis v Commission | 39 |
2012/C 138/96 | Case F-37/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 May 2011 — Stratakis v Commission | 39 |
2012/C 138/97 | Case F-95/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB | 39 |
2012/C 138/98 | Case F-103/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2011 — Jaeger v Eurofound | 39 |
2012/C 138/99 | Case F-105/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB | 40 |
2012/C 138/100 | Case F-127/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 February 2012 — Bömcke v EIB | 40 |
2012/C 138/101 | Case F-5/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v Commission | 40 |
2012/C 138/102 | Case F-15/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v SEAE | 40 |
2012/C 138/103 | Case F-26/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2011 — AC v Council | 40 |
2012/C 138/104 | Case F-30/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 October 2011 — Torijano Montero v Council | 40 |
2012/C 138/105 | Case F-35/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 December 2011 — Svitana v Parliament | 40 |
2012/C 138/106 | Case F-68/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 January 2012 — Schreiber v Commission | 40 |
